Fast-track green cards for foreign STEM grads—bypassing visa caps
H.R. 2627 — Keep STEM Talent Act of 2025 · Filed by Bill Foster (D-IL) · 26 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new immigration pathway for foreign students who earn master's degrees or higher in STEM fields from U.S. universities. It allows them to apply for permanent residency if they have a job offer paying above the median wage in their field, bypassing the usual employment-based visa queue. It also permits STEM graduate students to openly pursue permanent residency while on student visas, and requires stronger vetting procedures for foreign STEM graduate students.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to create a new, expedited green-card pathway for foreign STEM graduate degree holders, removing them from numerical caps and allowing dual intent during studies. This is a targeted immigration-policy reform, not a broad labor or education measure.
What the text implies
- Removes STEM master's+ degree holders from the annual employment-based visa cap (currently ~140,000 across all categories), potentially concentrating visa availability in this single cohort and reducing slots for other skilled workers, family-sponsored immigrants, or diversity visa holders.
- Requires only median-wage employment offers, not prevailing-wage determinations—lower than H-1B standards—which may suppress wage competition in STEM fields and allow employers to hire foreign talent at lower cost than domestic recruitment.
- Dual-intent provision (section 3(d)) permits F-visa holders to openly seek permanent residency while studying, reversing longstanding INA intent doctrine; this may increase visa fraud risk if students misrepresent intent or employers use the pathway to circumvent normal sponsorship timelines.
- Labor certification requirement (section 3(c)) is streamlined but still required; however, the bill does not specify whether STEM degree holders must wait for PERM certification or can apply concurrently, creating ambiguity in processing timelines.
- Annual reporting requirement (section 2(c)) mandates data on 'economic impacts' but does not define metrics or require analysis of wage effects on domestic STEM workers, limiting transparency on labor-market consequences.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
U.S. citizens and employers benefit from retaining skilled foreign STEM talent and filling high-wage technical roles, potentially boosting innovation and competitiveness. However, the bill may reduce visa availability or priority for other employment-based categories and could affect wage pressure in STEM fields if employers use this pathway to hire foreign workers at median-wage rates rather than competing for domestic talent.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. technology and engineering companies (visa-dependent hiring)
- Universities offering STEM graduate programs (increased international enrollment)
- Immigration law firms (increased visa petition volume)
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, Department of Labor, Department of Education, U.S. institutions of higher education, Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Higher Education Act of 1965, House Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Where it stands
26 cosponsors: 24 Democrats, 2 Republicans.
- Apr 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
9 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,680,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 12 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 89% of bills with at least one filing.
Bill Foster, the sponsor, reported $874,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Consumer Technology Association — $1,080,000 on 1 filing
- Invesco Group Services, Inc. — $650,000 on 2 filings
- Cornell University — $360,000 on 1 filing
- Vanteo Fka Bdv Solutions LLC — $350,000 on 2 filings
- International Society of Optics and Photonics — $100,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,205 characters) on Sep 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,522 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-21.
“Fast-track green cards for foreign STEM grads—bypassing visa caps” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2627 Report an error