Bill shields stop-loss insurance from state oversight, shifting health costs to workers
H.R. 2571 — Self-Insurance Protection Act · Filed by Robert Onder (R-MO) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 1, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill exempts stop-loss insurance purchased by self-insured employers from federal health insurance regulation under ERISA, and preempts state laws that restrict such insurance. Stop-loss insurance protects employers' own assets against catastrophic employee health claims; the bill treats it as a financial risk tool rather than health coverage, removing it from federal oversight and allowing employers to buy it without state-level restrictions.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a narrow exemption from federal and state oversight of stop-loss insurance. It redefines what counts as 'health insurance coverage' under ERISA to exclude stop-loss policies, and preempts state regulation of those policies—a classic deregulatory carve-out benefiting self-insured plan sponsors.
What the text implies
- Stop-loss insurance thresholds can be set high enough that employees bear most routine and moderate claims; the bill removes state-level guardrails that might otherwise prevent this cost-shifting to workers.
- Preemption of state law (Section 514 amendment) eliminates state consumer protections and solvency requirements for stop-loss carriers, potentially leaving employers and employees exposed if an insurer fails.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
self-insured employers (large and small); stop-loss insurance carriers and underwriters; insurance brokers and consultants specializing in stop-loss