Congress orders earthquake resilience blueprint—but who pays?
H.R. 2568 — Earthquake Resilience Act · Filed by Kevin Mullin (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 1, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the National Institute of Standards and Technology, working with FEMA, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Geological Survey, to conduct a national earthquake resilience assessment within two years and submit it to Congress. It also amends the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 to expand the federal earthquake research program to include post-earthquake recovery standards, lifeline infrastructure resilience, and real-time seismic monitoring data. The bill benefits communities and infrastructure operators by establishing clearer benchmarks for earthquake preparedness and recovery.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate a federal risk assessment and expand earthquake resilience research and standards development. It is a straightforward public-safety measure with no private giveaways or hidden riders.
What the text implies
- The bill requires coordination with 'other stakeholders' in the risk assessment, which may include private engineering firms and construction companies; their input could shape federal standards in ways that favor certain industry practices.
- Post-earthquake recovery standards developed under the amended program may become de facto requirements for infrastructure operators, potentially increasing compliance costs for utilities and transportation agencies.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
engineering and construction firms (standards development contracts); seismic monitoring equipment manufacturers; infrastructure operators (utilities, transportation agencies) implementing recovery standards