Bill expands U.S. farm exports by protecting generic food names abroad
H.R. 2558 — SAFETY Act of 2025 · Filed by Dusty Johnson (R-SD) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 1, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to define and protect the use of common food and beverage names (like 'Parmesan,' 'Feta,' 'Asiago,' and beer styles like 'IPA') in foreign markets. It requires the Secretary of Agriculture and the U.S. Trade Representative to negotiate trade agreements ensuring American producers can label and sell products using these generic names abroad, and mandates semi-annual briefings to Congress on their progress.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to protect and expand U.S. agricultural exports by securing the right to use common food and beverage names in foreign markets. It is a trade facilitation measure, not a subsidy or deregulation.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'common name' explicitly excludes protected geographical indications (e.g., 'Champagne,' 'Parmigiano-Reggiano' as protected EU names), which may limit the scope of names U.S. producers can claim in some markets.
- The semi-annual briefing requirement creates a transparency mechanism but does not mandate enforcement action if negotiations fail, leaving the remedy to future trade agreements.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. agricultural producers and exporters; U.S. food and beverage manufacturers; U.S. wine producers