Congress ties federal funding to state efficiency agencies—a federal mandate on state governance.
H.R. 2523 — State-Level DOGE Establishment Act · Filed by Claudia Tenney (R-NY) · Introduced Mar 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill conditions the receipt of federal discretionary funding on states establishing a new government efficiency agency (modeled on the federal 'DOGE' office) to review how states spend federal money and eliminate waste. The agency must have 10–20 members split equally between majority and minority parties in the state legislature, and must publish annual reports on its findings. Security-related federal spending is exempt from this condition.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a conditional funding requirement that forces states to establish a specific government structure (a bipartisan efficiency agency) as a prerequisite for receiving federal discretionary funds. This is a federal-to-state governance mandate, not a deregulatory or market-oriented measure.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a new federal reporting requirement: state efficiency agencies must submit annual reports to the federal 'Department of Government Efficiency' within the Executive Office of the President, establishing a direct federal oversight channel into state budget and administrative practices.
- The bipartisan composition requirement (equal majority/minority members) may create gridlock within state efficiency agencies, potentially limiting their effectiveness or turning them into partisan forums rather than genuine efficiency bodies.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens may benefit from increased scrutiny of waste in federal-fund administration at the state level, but the bill imposes a federal mandate on state governance structure (requiring a specific agency composition) as a condition of funding, which constrains state autonomy and may divert state resources to compliance rather than service delivery. The net effect depends on whether the efficiency gains outweigh the loss of state flexibility and the compliance burden.