Congress quietly doubles rural wood facility grants to $50M annually
H.R. 2517 — Community Wood Facilities Assistance Act of 2025 · Filed by Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends two existing federal grant programs for wood and forest biomass facilities. It increases funding caps from $1.5 million to $5 million per project, raises annual appropriations from $25 million to $50 million (for fiscal years 2026–2030), expands eligible activities to include new construction of forest products manufacturing facilities (not just retrofitting existing sawmills), raises thermal energy thresholds from 5 to 15 megawatts, and adds 'market competitiveness' as a criterion alongside cost-effectiveness. The changes benefit rural communities, forest product manufacturers, and biomass energy producers by making grants more accessible and larger.
Why we flagged it
The bill increases federal grant funding and eligibility for wood and forest biomass facilities, effectively expanding a subsidy program for rural wood product manufacturers and biomass energy producers. While framed as rural development assistance, the operative mechanism is a direct increase in federal grants to private entities in the forestry and wood products sector.
What the text implies
- Raising the per-project cap from $1.5M to $5M and annual funding from $25M to $50M may concentrate grants among larger, better-capitalized wood product firms rather than smaller rural operations, potentially reducing competition and consolidating the sector.
- Expanding eligible activities to 'construction' of new forest products manufacturing facilities (not just retrofitting) may incentivize new industrial capacity in rural areas, with uncertain demand and potential for stranded assets if market conditions shift.
- Adding 'market competitiveness' as a grant criterion alongside cost-effectiveness introduces subjective evaluation that may favor projects aligned with industry preferences over community benefit.
- Raising thermal energy thresholds from 5 to 15 megawatts may shift grants toward larger, more capital-intensive biomass energy projects, potentially favoring established firms over smaller community-based initiatives.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands federal support for rural wood-based manufacturing and biomass energy, which can create jobs and economic development in rural areas. However, the primary beneficiaries are wood product manufacturers and energy producers (private entities), not the general public directly; the public benefit is indirect (rural economic activity, potential renewable energy) and depends on how the grants are deployed and whether they generate broader community benefit beyond the grantees themselve
Who stands to gain
- wood product manufacturers
- forest biomass energy producers
- sawmill operators
- rural manufacturing firms in forestry sector
Named in the bill
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Section 9013, Section 8643, Community Wood Facilities Grant Program, Wood Innovations Grant Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Mar 31, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 31, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $5,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 11 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, the sponsor, reported $927,619 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Trea Senior Citizens League — $5,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 15, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,556 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 15, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly doubles rural wood facility grants to $50M annually” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2517 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.