Caffeine warning labels coming to restaurant menus and energy drinks
H.R. 2511 — Sarah Katz Caffeine Safety Act · Filed by Robert Menendez (D-NJ) · 16 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires restaurants with 20+ locations and packaged food manufacturers to label products containing 150+ mg of caffeine as 'High caffeine' on menus and packaging, and to disclose the exact milligram amount and whether caffeine is natural or added. It directs the FDA to review caffeine safety within 6 months, the NIH to study effects on vulnerable populations (children, pregnant women, people with heart conditions), funds a public education campaign on caffeine risks, and orders the GAO to investigate how caffeinated beverages are marketed to children.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory disclosure of caffeine content and health warnings on restaurant menus and packaged foods, paired with government safety reviews and public education. This is consumer-protection and transparency legislation, not a narrow carve-out or subsidy.
What the text implies
- Labeling requirement applies only to chains with 20+ locations, exempting small independent restaurants and cafes—may create competitive advantage for large chains that can absorb compliance costs.
- FDA must define 'added caffeine' by regulation; definition could significantly affect which products trigger labeling, creating regulatory uncertainty for manufacturers.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens, especially parents and people in vulnerable populations, gain transparent information about caffeine content and health risks. The labeling requirements, safety reviews, and public education campaign address a documented public health concern (caffeine-related injuries and deaths, particularly among youth) without restricting access or imposing costs on consumers.