Tax break for high earners in wealthy states, paid by everyone else
H.R. 246 — SALT Fairness for Working Families Act · Filed by Lauren Underwood (D-IL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 9, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill raises the federal cap on how much individuals can deduct from their federal income taxes for state and local taxes (SALT) from $10,000 to $15,000 per person ($30,000 for joint filers), effective for tax years starting in 2025. The change benefits taxpayers in high-tax states by allowing them to reduce their federal taxable income more substantially.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a straightforward increase to an existing tax deduction cap. It is a direct tax relief measure with no hidden provisions or riders.
What the text implies
- The benefit is heavily skewed toward higher-income taxpayers in high-tax states (NY, CA, NJ, IL, MA), as they are most likely to itemize deductions and exceed the prior $10,000 cap.
- Federal revenue loss is not offset by spending cuts or other revenue measures in this bill, implying the cost is absorbed by deficit spending or other taxpayers.
- The change may incentivize high-income earners to remain in or relocate to high-tax states, potentially affecting state tax competition and interstate migration patterns.
- Married couples filing jointly receive a disproportionately larger benefit ($30,000 cap) compared to single filers ($15,000), creating a marriage-bonus effect in the tax code.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Taxpayers in high-tax states and higher income brackets benefit from the larger deduction, reducing their federal tax burden. However, the revenue loss is borne by all taxpayers collectively through either higher deficits or reduced public services, and the benefit is concentrated among higher-income filers in specific states, creating a regressive distributional effect.
Who stands to gain
- high-income individual taxpayers
- taxpayers in high-tax states (California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts)
- real estate and professional services sectors in high-tax jurisdictions
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code Section 164(b)(6)(B), U.S. Department of the Treasury, Individual taxpayers, High-tax states
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Jan 9, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 9, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (535 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Tax break for high earners in wealthy states, paid by everyone else” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr246 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.