FCC Chair gets unilateral power to exclude 6G advisors as 'not trusted'
H.R. 2449 — Future Uses of Technology Upholding Reliable and Enhanced Networks Act · Filed by Doris Matsui (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 27, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the FCC to establish a task force within 120 days to study sixth-generation (6G) wireless technology. The task force will include representatives from telecom companies, public interest groups, and government agencies, and must publish a draft report within 180 days and a final report within one year on 6G standards, uses, limitations, and deployment strategies. The FCC Chair has sole authority to exclude any company, organization, or institution deemed "not trusted" based on foreign ownership or national security concerns.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is the establishment of a federally mandated advisory body to study and report on 6G technology. It is not a regulatory mandate, appropriation, or deregulation—it is a fact-finding and coordination instrument.
What the text implies
- The FCC Chair's unilateral power to exclude entities as 'not trusted' without defined procedural safeguards or appeal mechanism may enable politicized exclusion of competitors, foreign-owned subsidiaries, or disfavored organizations, potentially narrowing the diversity of input on critical infrastructure standards.
- The task force's composition and findings may be shaped by which industry players are permitted to participate, creating an asymmetric information advantage for 'trusted' companies in influencing 6G standards-setting and deployment strategy.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
telecommunications equipment manufacturers; wireless carriers and infrastructure companies; standards-setting bodies (industry consortia)