QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal law strips away state farm-worker overtime protections

H.R. 240 — Protect Local Farms Act · Filed by Claudia Tenney (R-NY) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 7, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernLabor Standard Preemption / Agricultural…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to allow federal law to override state laws that set a maximum workweek for agricultural employees below 60 hours. In effect, it prevents states from requiring overtime pay for farm workers who work more than 40–50 hours per week if a state's own law is stricter than the 60-hour federal floor this bill establishes.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a federal preemption of state labor law. It strips away state-level overtime protections for farm workers, replacing them with a weaker federal floor. This is functionally a deregulation of agricultural labor standards, even though the title frames it as protecting local farms.

What the text implies

  • The 60-hour workweek threshold is significantly higher than the federal 40-hour standard that triggers overtime for most workers. Agricultural workers would be exempt from overtime pay until they exceed 60 hours, a 50% higher bar than the general workforce.
  • States like California, which have stricter agricultural overtime rules, would be preempted. This eliminates a key competitive/regulatory difference between states and centralizes labor standards downward.
  • Agricultural workers are already among the lowest-paid and most vulnerable workers in the U.S., with limited union representation. Preempting state protections removes a critical avenue for worker advocacy at the state level.
  • The bill does not address whether the 60-hour threshold applies to all agricultural work or only certain categories, creating potential ambiguity in enforcement.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Agricultural workers in states with overtime protections stricter than 60 hours per week lose those protections. The bill reduces labor standards for a vulnerable workforce, shifting the balance away from worker protections toward employer flexibility.

Who stands to gain

  • agricultural employers and farm operations
  • large-scale farming corporations

Named in the bill

Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Section 18 FLSA, agricultural employees, state legislatures

Where it stands

3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.

  • Jan 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jan 7, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (597 characters) on Sep 23, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,707 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-09-23.

“Federal law strips away state farm-worker overtime protections” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr240 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record