QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal student aid now tied to immigration compliance—colleges lose funding if workers aren't verif

H.R. 2367 — College Employment Accountability Act · Filed by Erin Houchin (R-IN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Mar 26, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Immigration Compliance Enforcement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill bars colleges and universities from receiving federal student aid and institutional funding if they employ unauthorized immigrants or fail to use E-Verify (a federal employment-verification system). It requires DHS to monitor compliance every six months and notify the Education Department of violations, triggering loss of federal funding.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a funding eligibility condition tied to immigration law compliance (E-Verify participation and Section 274A of the INA). It is not primarily about higher education policy but about enforcing federal immigration employment rules through the leverage of federal student aid.

What the text implies

  • Institutions with limited compliance infrastructure or in resource-constrained regions may face disproportionate difficulty implementing E-Verify, creating unequal enforcement risk across the sector.
  • A single finding of violation by DHS triggers automatic ineligibility, with no apparent cure period or remediation pathway — colleges cannot regain eligibility mid-year if they correct the violation.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Students at institutions found in violation could lose access to federal aid, potentially forcing school closures or tuition increases — a concrete harm to student access and affordability. However, the bill's stated purpose (preventing employment of unauthorized workers) reflects a lawful policy objective; the civic cost arises from the enforcement mechanism (funding withdrawal) rather than the underlying rule.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record