QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress removes food-stamp penalty for striking workers

H.R. 2357 — Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025 · Filed by Alma Adams (D-NC) · 85 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Labor Protection / Food Security

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to remove a rule that makes striking workers and their households ineligible for SNAP (food stamps). Currently, federal law bars households where someone is on strike from receiving SNAP benefits; this bill deletes that bar, allowing striking workers' families to keep or obtain food assistance during labor disputes.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is to restore SNAP eligibility to striking workers by removing a statutory bar. It is a straightforward amendment to labor-adjacent food-assistance law, not a deregulation or carve-out — it restores a public benefit to a specific vulnerable population.

What the text implies

  • Removal of the strike-eligibility bar may increase SNAP enrollment during labor disputes, raising program costs; the bill does not appropriate additional funds, so costs fall within existing SNAP budget authority.
  • The amendment may indirectly strengthen workers' bargaining position by reducing household economic pressure during strikes, potentially affecting labor-market dynamics and employer negotiating leverage.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Striking workers and their families face income loss during labor actions; removing the SNAP eligibility bar ensures they retain access to food assistance during disputes, reducing hardship and economic coercion against union activity. The bill restores a public benefit to a vulnerable population without imposing costs on other citizens.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record