Congress makes sexual assault settlements tax-free for survivors
H.R. 2347 — Survivor Justice Tax Prevention Act · Filed by Lloyd Smucker (R-PA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 25, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the tax code to exclude from taxable income any damages (except punitive damages) that sexual assault survivors receive through court settlements or agreements. Currently, survivors must pay federal income tax on these settlement amounts; this bill makes those payments tax-free, similar to existing tax treatment for other personal injury settlements. The bill also shifts the burden of proof so that if a settlement explicitly states damages are for sexual acts or contact, the IRS must accept that characterization without requiring additional evidence.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a tax exclusion for non-punitive damages in sexual assault cases, paired with a burden-of-proof rule favoring survivors. It is straightforward victim-protection legislation with no hidden riders or narrow beneficiaries.
What the text implies
- The burden-of-proof shift (treating settlement language as 'credible evidence' and deeming the taxpayer to have met section 7491(2) requirements) may reduce IRS audit scrutiny of sexual assault settlements, potentially affecting tax compliance verification in edge cases where settlement amounts are unusually large or characterization is disputed.
- The bill's effective date applies only to decisions and agreements made after enactment, but includes a special rule allowing survivors to amend or replace pre-enactment agreements to claim the exclusion retroactively, which could create a window for amended returns and IRS processing delays.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Sexual assault survivors receive financial relief without federal tax liability, reducing the effective cost of their settlements and removing a perverse incentive that penalizes victims. The burden-of-proof shift protects survivors from IRS challenges to settlement characterizations, lowering litigation risk and administrative friction.