Congress moves to stop federal funding of painful animal research at universities
H.R. 233 — HELP PETS Act · Filed by Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 7, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits federal funding to colleges and universities that conduct painful biomedical research on dogs and cats, effective 180 days after enactment. It carves out exceptions for clinical veterinary research (treating sick or injured animals) and research on service or military animals. The bill defines 'painful research' by reference to USDA pain categories D and E, the most severe classifications.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a funding prohibition tied to research ethics (pain severity), not a deregulation, subsidy, or procedural change. It is a straightforward values-based restriction on how federal education dollars may be spent.
What the text implies
- Institutions may respond by relocating painful dog/cat research to private (non-federally-funded) labs, shifting the research outside federal oversight but not eliminating it.
- The USDA pain categories (D and E) are the operative standard; any change to USDA classification methodology could alter which research is prohibited without amending this statute.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens gain alignment between their tax dollars and their stated values: federal funding is withdrawn from research most citizens find ethically objectionable (painful experiments on companion animals), while legitimate clinical veterinary care and military/service animal research remain funded. The bill respects both animal welfare and legitimate research needs.