Pregnancy centers gain right to sue public health agencies over abortion policy
H.R. 2226 — Let Pregnancy Centers Serve Act of 2025 · Filed by Chris Smith (R-NJ) · 17 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 18, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the federal government and any entity receiving federal funds from discriminating against pregnancy centers and similar organizations that do not provide, refer for, or counsel in favor of abortion. It creates a private right of action allowing pregnancy centers and the Attorney General to sue for damages, injunctive relief, and attorney fees if they believe they have been discriminated against under the law.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is twofold: (1) a non-discrimination mandate protecting entities that do not participate in abortion services, and (2) a private right of action with damages and attorney fees. While framed as conscience protection, the litigation mechanism significantly expands liability exposure for public health entities and healthcare providers.
What the text implies
- The private right of action allows pregnancy centers to sue state and local health departments, hospitals, and public health agencies for damages without exhausting administrative remedies, potentially creating massive litigation costs and defensive postures that chill public health guidance on reproductive options.
- The definition of 'Federal financial assistance' excludes 'direct spending programs' but captures grants and payments for health services—creating ambiguity about which public health programs and providers are covered, likely generating years of litigation over scope.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
pregnancy centers and anti-abortion advocacy organizations (litigation funding, potential damages aw; litigation support organizations and attorneys specializing in conscience-protection claims