QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds emergency medical services workforce crisis—$70M to train paramedics and EMTs

H.R. 2220 — PARA–EMT Act of 2025 · Filed by Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) · 27 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 18, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Workforce Development

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program to help emergency medical services (EMS) agencies recruit, train, and retain paramedics and EMTs, addressing a documented workforce shortage. It authorizes $50 million annually (2026–2030) for EMS agencies to fund training, apprenticeships, wellness programs, and mental health education, with at least 20% of grants reserved for rural areas; establishes a separate $20 million annual program to help military veterans transition their combat medical training to civilian EMT/paramedic certification; and directs the Labor and Health departments to study the EMS workforce gap and report recommendations to Congress within one year.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal grant program to address a documented workforce shortage in emergency medical services. It is straightforward public health infrastructure investment with no hidden provisions or private carve-outs.

What the text implies

  • The bill's success depends on appropriations actually being enacted; authorization alone does not guarantee funding. If Congress fails to appropriate the authorized amounts, the program will be underfunded or stillborn.
  • The study requirement (Section 5) may lead to recommendations to expand Schedule A (expedited federal hiring) to include EMTs/paramedics, which could reshape how federal agencies recruit and hire EMS personnel—a downstream policy shift not explicitly stated in the bill.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Emergency medical services agencies (public and nonprofit); Accredited EMS training institutions; State health departments and EMS regulatory bodies

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record