Congress moves to ban salary-history questions, leveling pay negotiations
H.R. 2219 — Salary History Question Prohibition Act · Filed by Eleanor Norton (D-DC) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 18, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to prohibit employers from asking job applicants about their salary history, using that history to decide whether to hire them, or using it to set their pay—except after a job offer is made and the applicant voluntarily shares prior wages to negotiate higher pay. Employers who violate these rules face civil penalties of $5,000 to $10,000 per violation and can be sued by affected workers for up to $10,000 in damages plus attorney fees.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward labor-standards amendment that restricts employer conduct (salary-history inquiries and reliance) to protect worker bargaining power and reduce wage discrimination. It is a protective labor regulation, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.
What the text implies
- Employers may shift to alternative screening methods (education, certifications, skills tests) that could introduce different forms of bias if not carefully designed.
- The bill permits salary-history reliance only AFTER an offer is made and the applicant volunteers the information—this creates a narrow window and may incentivize applicants to disclose history early to negotiate, potentially undermining the intent.
- Public agencies are explicitly covered as employers, meaning state and local governments face the same penalties; compliance costs may fall on smaller municipalities with limited HR capacity.
- The $10,000 cap on special damages per employee may be insufficient to deter large employers, though the per-violation penalty structure ($5,000–$10,000) and attorney-fee provision provide some leverage.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill directly protects job applicants and workers by blocking a common employer practice that perpetuates wage inequality and suppresses pay, especially for women and workers of color who have historically earned less. Workers gain a negotiating advantage by preventing employers from anchoring offers to artificially low prior wages, and the private right of action gives them a concrete remedy.
Named in the bill
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, employers, prospective employees, current and former employers, Federal and State courts, public agencies
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Mar 18, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 18, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,850 characters) on Aug 11, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to ban salary-history questions, leveling pay negotiations” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2219 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.