New citizenship proof requirement for voter registration—with loopholes and local discretion.
H.R. 22 — SAVE Act · Filed by Chip Roy (R-TX) · 110 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the National Voter Registration Act to require all applicants registering to vote in federal elections to present documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a passport, birth certificate, or REAL ID-compliant identification. States must verify citizenship using federal databases (DHS SAVE system, Social Security Administration) and remove noncitizens from voter rolls. Applicants without documentary proof may attest under penalty of perjury and submit alternative evidence for official determination, but the default pathway requires physical proof presented in person or at the polling place.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a citizenship documentation requirement for federal voter registration, enforced through state verification processes and federal database integration. It is fundamentally an election administration and eligibility-verification measure, not a tax, appropriations, or commemorative bill.
What the text implies
- The bill exempts certain states from compliance for 60 days post-enactment if they adopt identical requirements by regulation, creating a temporary two-tier system and potential litigation risk over equal protection.
- Federal agencies must respond to state citizenship-verification requests within 24 hours with 'batched information,' establishing a new real-time data-sharing pipeline between election officials and DHS/SSA that may expand beyond citizenship verification over time.
- The private right of action (Section 11) permits citizens to sue election officials for registering applicants without documentary proof, potentially creating a new class of election-administration litigation and shifting enforcement burden to private parties.
- Applicants who cannot produce documentary proof may register via attestation and alternative evidence, but the bill does not define 'sufficiently established' citizenship, delegating discretion to state/local officials and creating inconsistent standards across jurisdictions.
- The bill requires DHS to investigate and initiate removal proceedings against individuals determined to be unlawfully registered, potentially triggering immigration enforcement consequences for citizens who register in good faith but lack documentary proof.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill addresses a legitimate election-integrity concern (noncitizen voting) by establishing a citizenship verification mechanism, which may reduce fraud. However, it imposes new procedural burdens on voters—requiring in-person presentation of specific documents—that may suppress legitimate voter registration, particularly among citizens without readily available proof (naturalized citizens, those born abroad to U.S. parents, homeless individuals, or those with lost documents). The alternative
Named in the bill
National Voter Registration Act of 1993, REAL ID Act of 2005, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Social Security Administration (SSA), Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE), Social Security Number Verification Service, State election officials, State motor vehicle agencies
Where it stands
110 cosponsors: 109 Republicans, 1 Independents.
- Jan 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on House Administration”
- Apr 10, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 102). (text: CR H1569-1571)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
27 lobbying clients named this bill on 42 disclosure filings across 6 quarters, Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,890,860 in lobbying spend. A filing names 16 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 97% of bills with at least one filing.
Chip Roy, the sponsor, reported $68,100 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Service Employees International Union Ctw-clc — $1,386,000 on 5 filings
- Friends Committee on National Legislation — $1,000,000 on 1 filing
- AFL-CIO — $760,000 on 1 filing
- United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy — $520,000 on 1 filing
- Human Rights Campaign — $439,908 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 24, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (20,378 characters) on Jul 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 24, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“New citizenship proof requirement for voter registration—with loopholes and local discretion.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr22 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.