QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal health program tightens eligibility verification, removes ineligible enrollees

H.R. 2193 — FEHB Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Glenn Grothman (R-WI) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 18, 2025 · Reported out

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Federal Health Program Integrity Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to verify that federal employees and their family members enrolled in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program are actually eligible to be enrolled. It mandates a three-year audit of family member eligibility, creates a process to remove ineligible people from coverage, and appropriates approximately $80 million in fiscal year 2026 plus ongoing funding (starting at ~$37 million annually, growing 2.2% per year) for OPM and its Inspector General to conduct these verification and audit activities.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is administrative oversight and fraud prevention in the FEHB program—verifying eligibility, auditing enrollment, and removing ineligible participants. It is a governance and compliance measure, not a substantive benefit expansion or restriction.

What the text implies

  • The bill creates a new ongoing funding stream for OPM and its Inspector General that is explicitly exempt from annual congressional appropriations caps (Section 3 states amounts 'shall not be subject to the limitations that may be specified annually by Congress'), potentially insulating these offices from normal budget discipline.
  • Disenrollment of ineligible family members may create administrative burden and appeals processes not detailed in the bill, potentially affecting thousands of federal employees and their dependents.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Office of Personnel Management (administrative funding increase); OPM Office of Inspector General (new oversight funding); Federal health insurance carriers (potential compliance/audit service providers)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record