QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress cuts off federal funding for California's high-speed rail project

H.R. 213 — To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a certain high-speed rail development project in the State of California, and for other purposes. · Filed by Kevin Kiley (I-CA) · Introduced Jan 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Single-State Infrastructure Defunding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits the federal government from providing any financial assistance to California for a high-speed rail project that matches or closely resembles the one covered by a specific 2012 federal-state cooperative agreement (FR–HSR–0118–12–01–01). The bill cuts off federal funding for this particular rail corridor development.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a targeted prohibition on federal funding for a specific California rail project identified by a 2012 cooperative agreement number. It is not a general policy statement but a surgical cut to one state's infrastructure investment.

What the text implies

  • The bill targets a project by reference to a 2012 agreement number rather than by name or description, making it difficult for the public to understand which specific corridor is affected without external research.
  • Introduced by a California representative (Kiley), the bill may signal intra-state political conflict over the high-speed rail project, which has been controversial in California; the federal prohibition could be used as a political weapon in state-level debates.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary Californians lose access to federal infrastructure investment in high-speed rail, which would have reduced transportation costs, congestion, and emissions while creating jobs. The bill removes a public benefit without stated justification or alternative funding mechanism.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record