Federal GME funding now tied to restricting gender-affirming care for minors
H.R. 2107 — Children’s Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2025 · Filed by Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 14, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill extends federal funding for children's hospitals' graduate medical education (GME) programs through fiscal year 2030 and increases annual appropriations to $124 million and $261 million across two funding streams. However, it conditions this funding on a prohibition: starting in fiscal year 2026, children's hospitals that provide gender-affirming surgical or hormonal procedures to minors become ineligible for these federal GME payments, with a narrow exception for treatment of disorders of sex development and precocious puberty.
Why we flagged it
The bill's primary stated purpose is GME reauthorization and funding extension, which is routine. However, the operative mechanism is a funding condition that restricts hospital eligibility based on provision of a specific category of medical care—making the bill functionally a policy rider that uses appropriations authority to enforce a substantive healthcare restriction unrelated to medical education itself.
- Subsection (e)(4) conditions GME funding eligibility on hospitals NOT providing gender-affirming procedures/drugs to minors—a healthcare policy restriction unrelated to graduate medical education.
What the text implies
- The funding prohibition applies retroactively to fiscal year 2026 based on conduct in the preceding fiscal year (Sept 1–Dec 31, 2025), creating a short compliance window and potential mid-year funding disruption.
- The definition of 'specified procedures and drugs' is extremely detailed and expansive, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy at doses above endogenous levels, potentially capturing standard clinical practice in some cases.
- The exception for 'disorders of sex development' is narrowly defined by genetic/chromosomal criteria and may not cover all clinically recognized conditions, creating ambiguity about what qualifies.
- Hospitals that lose GME funding face pressure to cease offering gender-affirming care entirely, even though the restriction applies only to minors and the funding is for education, not direct patient care.
- The bill does not address whether states or private insurers can fill the gap if federal GME funding is lost, potentially creating a two-tier system where funding availability determines care access.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill provides needed funding continuity for pediatric medical education, which benefits the public health workforce. However, it uses federal funding as leverage to restrict access to medical care that some minors and their families seek, and that major medical organizations recognize as appropriate in certain circumstances, creating a real tension between education funding and healthcare access.
Who stands to gain
- children's hospitals that do not provide gender-affirming care to minors
- medical education programs at compliant institutions
Named in the bill
Public Health Service Act, Section 340E, children's hospitals, graduate medical education (GME) programs, gender-affirming care providers, minors under 18 years of age
Where it stands
11 cosponsors: 11 Republicans.
- Mar 14, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 14, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,159,908 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Dan Crenshaw, the sponsor, reported $606,011 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — $520,000 on 2 filings
- Human Rights Campaign — $439,908 on 2 filings
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta — $100,000 on 2 filings
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta — $100,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,411 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 2107 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (11)
- Bill text the analysis read
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — LDA filing, 2025 Q4
- Human Rights Campaign — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Dan Crenshaw — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Federal GME funding now tied to restricting gender-affirming care for minors” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2107 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.