QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal sports betting rules: protections for some, expansion for all

H.R. 2087 — SAFE Bet Act of 2025 · Filed by Paul Tonko (D-NY) · Introduced Mar 11, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernSports Betting Regulatory Framework

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes federal minimum standards for legal sports betting in states that choose to allow it. It creates a federal licensing system where states must apply to the Attorney General to run sports betting programs, prohibits betting on amateur and college sports, restricts marketing and bonus offers, requires operators to fund gambling addiction treatment, and sets up a national self-exclusion list so people can ban themselves from betting across all states. The bill bans unlicensed betting entirely and takes effect 18 months after enactment.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to establish federal minimum standards for state-licensed sports betting, not to ban or promote betting. It creates a regulatory regime with Attorney General approval, consumer protections, and public health provisions. This is regulatory architecture, not a simple prohibition or permission.

What the text implies

  • The bill legalizes sports betting in any state that meets federal standards, potentially expanding gambling access significantly. While protections are mandated, the underlying policy choice—to permit betting—is not debated in the title or summary.
  • Section 103(b)(6)(F) requires affordability checks only for deposits >$1,000/day or >$10,000/month, meaning smaller daily bets ($999/day) avoid scrutiny entirely, potentially enabling gradual accumulation of losses.
  • Section 103(b)(7)(C) bans sports betting ads between 8am–10pm local time and during live broadcasts, but does not restrict social media, streaming platforms, or sponsorships—major advertising channels remain open.
  • The bill requires states to fund gambling addiction treatment from operator revenue (103(b)(6)(D)) but does not specify a minimum percentage, allowing states to set token allocations.
  • Interstate sports wagering compacts (Section 103(b)(2)(B)(ii)) allow betting across state lines if states agree, potentially undermining state-level consumer protections and creating regulatory arbitrage.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Citizens in participating states gain concrete protections: affordability checks (no deposits >$1,000/day without income verification), prohibition on credit-card deposits, self-exclusion lists, mandatory addiction treatment funding, restrictions on predatory bonuses and VIP programs, and AI-driven targeting bans. However, the bill does not ban sports betting itself—it legalizes and regulates it—which may increase problem gambling rates despite protections. The bill also does not apply to states

Who stands to gain

  • Licensed sports wagering operators (casinos, online platforms)
  • Interactive sports wagering platforms
  • Sports organizations (receive data licensing fees and integrity-monitoring authority)
  • Gambling addiction treatment providers (mandated funding stream)

Named in the bill

Attorney General (federal approval authority), State regulatory entities, Sports wagering operators, Interactive sports wagering platforms, Licensed gaming facilities, Indian Tribes, Sports organizations, Department of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use

Where it stands

  • Mar 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Mar 11, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

5 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,010,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 78% of bills with at least one filing.

Paul Tonko, the sponsor, reported $698,050 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • American Gaming Association — $660,000 on 1 filing
  • Caesars Enterprise Services LLC — $180,000 on 2 filings
  • Underdog Sports Holdings, Inc. — $80,000 on 2 filings
  • National Thoroughbred Racing Association (ntra) — $50,000 on 1 filing
  • National Thoroughbred Racing Association — $40,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (46,353 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal sports betting rules: protections for some, expansion for all” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2087 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.