Congress mandates shark-attack alerts on your phone
H.R. 2076 — Lulu’s Law · Filed by Gary Palmer (R-AL) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 11, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the FCC to allow wireless emergency alerts (the system that sends urgent messages to cell phones) to be used for shark attack warnings within 180 days of enactment. The bill is named after Lulu, apparently a shark attack victim, and would expand the types of emergencies that trigger automatic public alerts to include shark attacks.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a mandate to the FCC to add shark attacks to the list of events triggering wireless emergency alerts. It is a narrow, single-purpose expansion of an existing public-safety system.
What the text implies
- Bill does not specify alert thresholds, geographic scope, or confirmation protocols—FCC has discretion to define 'shark attack' and alert criteria, potentially creating system-wide alert fatigue if alerts are triggered for minor incidents.
- Wireless emergency alert system is designed for mass-casualty, imminent-threat scenarios (hurricanes, active shooters, tsunamis); adding low-frequency events may degrade public attention to high-severity alerts.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Shark attack alerts could provide real-time safety information to beachgoers in affected areas, potentially saving lives through rapid warning. However, the bill's actual public-health benefit is unclear—shark attacks are extremely rare (fewer than 50 per year in the U.S.), and the cost-benefit of system-wide alert infrastructure expansion for such low-frequency events is uncertain.