Treasury to spend $6B on Bitcoin while Americans wait for roads
H.R. 2032 — BITCOIN Act of 2025 · Filed by Nicholas Begich (R-AK) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the U.S. Treasury to purchase 1 million Bitcoin over 5 years and establish a 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve'—a network of secure storage facilities across the country—to hold the government's Bitcoin holdings for at least 20 years. The bill also consolidates all Bitcoin currently held by federal agencies (like the U.S. Marshals Service) into this reserve, allows states to voluntarily store their own Bitcoin in segregated accounts within it, and funds the purchases using Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate revaluations. The government would retain any Bitcoin created through network 'forks' or 'airdrops' for 5 years before deciding whether to sell non-dominant assets.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to commit federal resources to purchasing and holding Bitcoin as a national reserve asset, framed as financial security but mechanically a speculative bet on cryptocurrency appreciation. The stated purpose (financial resilience, global competitiveness) is aspirational; the actual mechanism is asset accumulation with no revenue-generating or public-service component.
- Section 9 amends Federal Reserve gold certificate procedures to extract cash remittances for Bitcoin purchases—a technical financial engineering unrelated to the bill's stated Bitcoin reserve purpose.
- Section 11 amends the ESF to authorize Bitcoin purchases and add Bitcoin to the fund's permitted instruments—a separate statutory authority expansion not inherent to establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a 20-year minimum holding period during which $6+ billion in annual Federal Reserve remittances are locked into Bitcoin, reducing flexibility for deficit reduction or emergency fiscal response.
- State participation in segregated accounts (Section 8) creates a novel federal-state custody arrangement with explicit liability waivers for the federal government—potentially exposing states to total loss while the federal government bears no accountability except for 'gross negligence.'
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Bitcoin miners and exchanges (increased demand and legitimacy); Cryptocurrency custodians and security firms (contract opportunities); Existing Bitcoin holders (price appreciation from government demand signal)