Military bases must test and cut PFAS pollution under new DoD mandate
H.R. 1938 — Department of Defense PFAS Discharge Prevention Act · Filed by Jennifer McClellan (D-VA) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Department of Defense to request modifications to stormwater discharge permits at its facilities to add quarterly monitoring for PFAS (forever chemicals) and implement pollution-reduction practices. It also mandates that at least 1% of DoD's annual PFAS remediation funding be spent on testing stormwater runoff at military bases for these chemicals.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a direct environmental mandate: it requires DoD to seek permit modifications imposing PFAS monitoring and pollution controls on military facilities. This is straightforward environmental regulation, not a subsidy, carve-out, or procedural measure.
What the text implies
- Establishes a precedent that federal agencies must affirmatively seek stricter environmental permits rather than passively accepting existing ones—a shift in regulatory posture that could extend to other agencies and pollutants.
- The 1% funding floor may create tension with other DoD PFAS priorities (remediation, site cleanup) if total PFAS funding is capped, forcing trade-offs between testing and remediation.
- Quarterly monitoring at military bases will generate public data on PFAS discharge rates, potentially exposing the scale of contamination and creating political pressure for broader federal PFAS regulation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
PFAS contamination from military facilities poses documented public-health risks (thyroid disease, immune suppression, cancer links). Mandatory monitoring and pollution controls reduce exposure for communities near bases and drinking-water sources. The 1% funding floor ensures testing actually occurs rather than being deferred.
Who stands to gain
- Environmental testing and consulting firms
- Water treatment technology vendors
- Stormwater management system manufacturers
Named in the bill
Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, State environmental agencies, PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Section 402(p) stormwater permits
Where it stands
18 cosponsors: 11 Democrats, 7 Republicans.
- Mar 6, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 6, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $200,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 26 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Jennifer McClellan, the sponsor, reported $699,956 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Southern Environmental Law Center — $200,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,297 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Military bases must test and cut PFAS pollution under new DoD mandate” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1938 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.