QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress expands farmland surveillance, bars foreign investors from federal farm aid

H.R. 1920 — FARMLAND Act of 2025 · Filed by Randy Feenstra (R-IA) · 19 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Agricultural National Security Oversight

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill strengthens federal oversight of foreign investment in U.S. agricultural land, particularly targeting China and state sponsors of terrorism. It creates new reporting requirements, civil penalties (5–25% of transaction value), a new federal investigative position, a public database of foreign-owned farmland, and bars foreign persons from receiving Farm Service Agency benefits. It also expands the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) authority to review real estate purchases over $5 million or 320 acres by foreign entities of concern.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is strengthening federal monitoring and enforcement against foreign acquisition of U.S. farmland, framed as a national security and food security measure. While it includes transparency and reporting provisions, the operative thrust is regulatory tightening and investigative authority expansion.

What the text implies

  • The due diligence requirement (Section 5) imposes an affirmative certification duty on real estate agents, brokers, and title companies without defining what 'due diligence' means or providing safe harbors—creating potential liability exposure for private parties in routine transactions.
  • The public database of foreign-owned farmland (Section 6) may enable targeting of foreign investors for harassment or discrimination, and the lack of data-security provisions raises privacy concerns for legitimate foreign owners.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. agricultural producers (protected from foreign competition); Federal agencies (expanded enforcement budgets and personnel); Domestic real estate and agricultural service providers (compliance consulting demand)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record