Congress blocks Fed from issuing digital currency, entrenches private banks
H.R. 1919 — Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act · Filed by Tom Emmer (R-MN) · 135 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the Federal Reserve from offering financial products or services directly to individuals, from maintaining individual accounts, and from issuing or testing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)—either directly or indirectly through intermediaries. It also declares that the Fed lacks authority to create a CBDC unless Congress explicitly grants it. The bill benefits citizens concerned about financial surveillance and Fed overreach by blocking a potential pathway to direct government control of personal money.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a series of prohibitions on Federal Reserve authority—blocking direct consumer banking, account-holding, and CBDC issuance. It is fundamentally a constraint on government power, not a market intervention or subsidy.
What the text implies
- By blocking Fed-issued CBDCs, the bill may entrench private banking intermediaries as the sole providers of digital payment infrastructure, potentially protecting their market position and fee structures from disruption by a public alternative.
- The prohibition on 'substantially similar' digital assets under 'any other name or label' is broad enough to potentially capture stablecoins or other private digital currencies if regulators interpret them as CBDC-adjacent, creating regulatory uncertainty.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
commercial banks and financial institutions (protected from Fed competition in retail banking and di; insurance companies and asset managers (mapped stocks suggest regulatory-exposure firms may benefit