Congress speeds up bank mergers, silences community voices in review
H.R. 1900 — Bank Failure Prevention Act of 2025 · Filed by Andy Barr (R-KY) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 6, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill accelerates the approval timeline for bank mergers and acquisitions by requiring federal regulators (the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC) to decide within 90 days whether to approve or deny applications, with automatic approval if they miss the deadline. It also narrows what regulators can consider when reviewing applications—they may only look at information the applicant provides, not third-party reports, views, or recommendations from community groups, consumer advocates, or other stakeholders.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a hard 90-day deadline with automatic approval on regulator silence, combined with a prohibition on third-party input. This is functionally a deregulatory measure that accelerates consolidation and narrows public-interest review, despite the title's 'failure prevention' framing.
What the text implies
- Automatic approval on regulator silence creates a 'use it or lose it' pressure on agencies, incentivizing approval over careful scrutiny of complex deals.
- Exclusion of third-party information (community groups, consumer advocates, fair-lending monitors) removes a traditional check on bank consolidation's local impact.
- The 'materially deficient' standard for rejecting applicant responses is undefined and may be difficult for regulators to enforce, further weakening review.
- Applicants can request tolling extensions (up to 30 days), but regulators cannot extend beyond 120 days total—asymmetric timeline favors applicants.
- The bill applies uniformly to all three regulatory pathways (Fed, FDIC, OCC), creating a single-track approval regime that may not account for deal complexity or systemic risk.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill removes a key public-interest safeguard by barring regulators from considering third-party input (community impact, consumer protection concerns, fair lending issues) during bank merger review. The automatic-approval mechanism pressures regulators to rubber-stamp deals or lose authority, weakening scrutiny of consolidation that may harm consumers through reduced competition, higher fees, or branch closures in underserved areas.
Who stands to gain
- large bank holding companies seeking acquisitions
- regional and community banks pursuing consolidation
- financial services M&A advisors and legal firms
Named in the bill
Federal Reserve Board, FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency), Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, Home Owners' Loan Act, Federal Deposit Insurance Act, USB (U.S. Bancorp), BK (Bank of New York Mellon), CATY (Cathay General Bancorp), PEBO (Peoples Bancorp)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- Mar 6, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 6, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
- May 21, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- May 21, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 21”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $37,756,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 128 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Andy Barr, the sponsor, reported $2,160,072 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $37,710,000 on 2 filings
- First-citizens Bank & Trust Company — $46,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,742 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress speeds up bank mergers, silences community voices in review” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1900 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.