QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal push to replace $1,290 textbooks with free open-source alternatives

H.R. 1886 — Affordable College Textbook Act · Filed by Joe Neguse (D-CO) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 5, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Student Cost-Relief & Transparency Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program to help colleges adopt and create open-source textbooks—free educational materials that students can access without paying publishers. It also requires colleges to disclose textbook prices and whether materials are open-source on course schedules, and mandates that publishers reveal how they collect student data from digital textbooks. The goal is to reduce the $1,290 average annual textbook cost students face by expanding free alternatives.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal grant program to expand free textbooks and mandate price/data-use disclosure. It directly addresses a documented student financial burden ($1,290/year) through market substitution (open-source alternatives) rather than price controls, and strengthens information access for consumers.

What the text implies

  • Textbook publishers (Pearson, Cengage, McGraw-Hill) face potential revenue erosion if open-source adoption accelerates; the bill's success depends on faculty willingness to switch, which is not guaranteed despite federal incentives.
  • The data-transparency requirement (Section 4) may expose publisher data-collection practices to public scrutiny, potentially triggering student privacy concerns or regulatory follow-up if abusive terms are revealed.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Students (direct cost savings through free/low-cost open textbooks); Colleges and universities (federal grants to offset transition costs); Open educational resource platforms and repositories (increased demand for hosting/curation services

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record