Congress orders study of why leased farmland lags in conservation
H.R. 1853 — CALL Act · Filed by Julia Brownley (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture to study why farmers and ranchers who lease (rather than own) their land participate less in federal conservation programs and adopt fewer conservation practices. The study will examine lease structures, landowner awareness, regional differences, and federal incentives, with a report due by December 31, 2026, and recommendations for removing barriers to conservation adoption on leased land.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward research authorization with no regulatory or financial mechanism—it directs USDA to conduct a study and report findings and recommendations. It is not a subsidy, deregulation, or enforcement action.
What the text implies
- Study findings may inform future conservation incentive redesign, potentially shifting federal spending toward leased-land operators and away from owner-operators, affecting farm subsidy distribution.
- Recommendations for 'existing statutory authorities' may enable USDA to reinterpret or expand conservation program eligibility without new legislation, creating de facto policy change.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill funds research into a genuine public-interest problem—conservation adoption on leased land—with no private carve-outs, liability shields, or subsidies to named parties. The study may inform future policy that increases conservation on 39% of U.S.