Congress orders study of why leased farmland lags in conservation
H.R. 1853 — CALL Act · Filed by Julia Brownley (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture to study why farmers and ranchers who lease (rather than own) their land participate less in federal conservation programs and adopt fewer conservation practices. The study will examine lease structures, landowner awareness, regional differences, and federal incentives, with a report due by December 31, 2026, and recommendations for removing barriers to conservation adoption on leased land.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward research authorization with no regulatory or financial mechanism—it directs USDA to conduct a study and report findings and recommendations. It is not a subsidy, deregulation, or enforcement action.
What the text implies
- Study findings may inform future conservation incentive redesign, potentially shifting federal spending toward leased-land operators and away from owner-operators, affecting farm subsidy distribution.
- Recommendations for 'existing statutory authorities' may enable USDA to reinterpret or expand conservation program eligibility without new legislation, creating de facto policy change.
- Focus on 'non-operating landlords' and lease-structure barriers may eventually support policies that reduce landlord control over tenant conservation decisions, affecting property-rights expectations in agricultural leasing.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill funds research into a genuine public-interest problem—conservation adoption on leased land—with no private carve-outs, liability shields, or subsidies to named parties. The study may inform future policy that increases conservation on 39% of U.S. agricultural land, benefiting soil health, water quality, and climate resilience. The focus on farmers of color and beginning farmers adds equity consideration.
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Cooperative Extension System, American Farmland Trust, farmers and ranchers (leased-land operators), agricultural landowners
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Mar 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,131 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders study of why leased farmland lags in conservation” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1853 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.