Federal agencies lose veto over telecom tower placement on public lands
H.R. 1836 — GRANTED Act of 2025 · Filed by Jay Obernolte (R-CA) · Introduced Mar 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal law to create an automatic approval mechanism for communications facility applications (like cell towers or broadband infrastructure) on federal land. If a federal agency fails to grant or deny a complete application within a specified deadline, the application is automatically deemed granted. The bill defines when an application is 'complete' (applicant has submitted required materials and the agency hasn't requested missing information within 30 days) and when it is 'received' for deadline purposes.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a deemed-grant provision that bypasses agency discretion and environmental review timelines for communications facility permits on federal land. This is functionally a deregulatory measure favoring telecom and broadband operators over federal land stewardship.
What the text implies
- Automatic approval may circumvent National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review and other environmental compliance requirements if agencies cannot complete review within the deadline, potentially allowing facility placement in sensitive habitats or protected areas.
- The 30-day window for agencies to request missing information is extremely tight for complex applications involving environmental assessment, tribal consultation, or multi-agency coordination, effectively pressuring agencies to approve incomplete applications or lose authority.
- Private telecom operators gain unilateral control over the 'completeness' determination by controlling what information they submit; agencies cannot demand additional environmental or cultural data without triggering the 30-day clock.
- Rural broadband deployment may accelerate, but without agency oversight of siting, placement could prioritize profitable corridors over underserved communities, undermining the public-interest rationale.
- The bill applies retroactively to applications received after enactment, potentially reviving previously denied or stalled applications without re-evaluation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill may accelerate broadband and communications infrastructure deployment, potentially benefiting rural and underserved communities with faster network access. However, it strips federal agencies of meaningful review authority over facility placement on public lands, potentially compromising environmental review, wildlife protection, and public land stewardship without requiring agencies to weigh competing public interests.
Who stands to gain
- telecommunications companies
- broadband infrastructure operators
- wireless carriers
- tower companies
Named in the bill
Broadcom (BE), Federal Communications Commission, Department of Interior, Department of Agriculture, executive agencies, Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Section 6409
Where it stands
- Mar 4, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Mar 4, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $8,503,687 in lobbying spend. A filing names 25 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Jay Obernolte, the sponsor, reported $976,024 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $10,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Charter Communications Inc — $5,020,000 on 2 filings
- Toyota Motor North America Inc (tma) — $3,483,687 on 2 filings
- Telecommunity — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,519 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal agencies lose veto over telecom tower placement on public lands” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1836 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.