QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding to preserve fishing communities and public waterfront access

H.R. 1808 — Keep America’s Waterfronts Working Act of 2025 · Filed by Chellie Pingree (D-ME) · 20 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 3, 2025 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Waterfront Preservation and Access Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes a federal task force and two grant/loan programs to help coastal states, tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations preserve working waterfronts—docks, boat ramps, and related facilities used by commercial and recreational fishers, aquaculture operators, and other water-dependent businesses. The bill authorizes $50 million annually through 2029 for competitive grants to acquire, improve, or protect working waterfronts from conversion to incompatible uses, and another $50 million for a revolving loan fund that states can use to finance waterfront projects. Beneficiaries include coastal communities, fishing industries, and local governments seeking to maintain public access to coastal waters and preserve maritime heritage.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal grant and revolving loan program designed to preserve working waterfronts and maintain public access to coastal waters. It amends the Coastal Zone Management Act to add task force, grant, and loan fund provisions—all aligned with the stated purpose of keeping waterfronts working.

What the text implies

  • The bill's covenant mechanism (perpetual restrictions on waterfront use) may create long-term encumbrances on private property that could affect future development or sale value, though this is intentional and disclosed.
  • The 0.2% annual reservation for Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations in the loan fund is a meaningful but modest set-aside; actual benefit depends on application rates and state administration.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

coastal state governments; local governments and municipalities; nonprofit organizations (as qualified holders and loan recipients)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record