QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress bans itself from profiting off defense contracts it controls

H.R. 1756 — Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act of 2025 · Filed by Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) · 14 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 27, 2025 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Congressional Conflict-of-Interest…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from owning stock, bonds, or other securities in defense contractors or companies in the defense industrial base. Members must divest within 120 days (180 days for complex private investments); new members must divest within the same timeframe after taking office. The bill includes narrow exceptions for diversified mutual funds and U.S. Treasury securities, and creates a $50,000 civil penalty per violation enforced by the Attorney General or Special Counsel.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward ban on a specific category of financial holdings by a defined group (Members of Congress and their families), with civil enforcement. It is a transparency and accountability measure targeting self-dealing by elected officials.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not restrict Members from trading defense stocks BEFORE enactment or from receiving capital gains on divested holdings, only ongoing ownership and future trading.
  • Enforcement relies on the Attorney General or Special Counsel bringing civil actions; no automatic disclosure or real-time monitoring mechanism is specified, creating potential enforcement gaps.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill directly restricts Members of Congress from profiting off defense contracts they may influence through legislation or appropriations, reducing a clear conflict of interest that undermines public trust in government. Citizens benefit from reduced incentives for lawmakers to favor defense spending for personal financial gain.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record