Tax subsidy for gun safes: who really saves money?
H.R. 169 — Prevent Family Fire Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Levin (D-CA) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal tax credit equal to 10% of the retail price (capped at $400 per device) for manufacturers and retailers who sell firearm storage devices designed to prevent unauthorized access. The credit applies to sales through December 31, 2032, and is intended to incentivize the production and sale of gun safes and locking mechanisms that keep firearms away from children and unauthorized users.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a targeted tax credit (10% of retail sales price, capped at $400 per device) for manufacturers and retailers selling compliant gun safes. It is a subsidy dressed as a safety measure, with the financial benefit flowing primarily to the supply side rather than directly to consumers.
What the text implies
- The credit is available to manufacturers and retailers, not consumers — the tax benefit accrues to the business selling the device, not the person buying it. Whether consumers see lower prices depends on retailer discretion.
- The bill defines 'safe firearm storage device' narrowly (combination lock, key lock, or biometric lock integrated into the device design). Aftermarket safes, gun cabinets, or storage solutions not meeting this definition are ineligible, potentially limiting the universe of compliant products.
- No requirement that retailers pass tax savings to consumers; the credit may simply increase retailer margins without reducing the out-of-pocket cost of gun safes for families.
- The annual Treasury report disaggregated by state creates a public record of which states have the highest gun-safe sales, potentially revealing state-level gun ownership patterns and storage practices.
- Termination date (December 31, 2032) creates a sunset; after that date, the tax incentive disappears, potentially causing a cliff in production and retail pricing if the market has not matured.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill may reduce barriers to purchasing gun safes by lowering effective retail prices through tax incentives, potentially improving child safety and accident prevention. However, the primary financial benefit flows to manufacturers and retailers as a tax subsidy; the public benefit depends on whether price reductions are passed to consumers and whether uptake actually increases gun storage compliance.
Who stands to gain
- Firearm storage device manufacturers
- Retailers selling gun safes and locking mechanisms
- Biometric lock technology suppliers
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Section 921 of title 18 United States Code, Secretary of the Treasury, Firearm storage device manufacturers and retailers
Where it stands
10 cosponsors: 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans.
- Jan 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
9 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,929,548 in lobbying spend. A filing names 38 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 89% of bills with at least one filing.
Mike Levin, the sponsor, reported $429,156 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund — $1,570,000 on 1 filing
- National Association of Children's Hospitals (n.a.c.h.) — $1,370,000 on 1 filing
- National Association for Gun Rights — $429,548 on 2 filings
- Johns Hopkins University — $350,000 on 1 filing
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence — $80,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,143 characters) on Aug 24, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 169 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (10)
- Bill text the analysis read
- Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Association of Children's Hospitals (n.a.c.h.) — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Association for Gun Rights — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Mike Levin — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Tax subsidy for gun safes: who really saves money?” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr169 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.