Federal disaster funds now stack for utilities—no ratepayer guarantee
H.R. 164 — Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act of 2025 · Filed by Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Stafford Act to allow electric utilities to combine emergency power-restoration assistance with hazard-mitigation work (like hardening infrastructure against future storms) in a single project, and clarifies that receiving emergency restoration funds does not disqualify a utility from also receiving separate hazard-mitigation grants. The bill applies only to appropriations made after enactment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative effect is to expand federal disaster-relief funding eligibility for electric utilities by removing a restriction on stacking emergency and mitigation assistance. While framed as resilience policy, the mechanism is a financial benefit to a regulated private sector (investor-owned utilities) with no corresponding mandate for public benefit or cost control.
What the text implies
- Federal hazard-mitigation funds (intended for public resilience) may be used by utilities to offset private capital expenditures that would otherwise be funded by ratepayers or shareholders, effectively subsidizing utility balance sheets.
- The bill does not require utilities to demonstrate cost-effectiveness of combined projects or to pass savings to ratepayers, creating moral hazard: utilities may bundle low-priority mitigation with emergency work to maximize federal reimbursement.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
investor-owned electric utilities; electric utility contractors and suppliers