Congress mandates age verification for porn sites—but at what privacy cost?
H.R. 1623 — SCREEN Act · Filed by Mary Miller (R-IL) · 27 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 26, 2025 · Markup held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires adult websites hosting pornographic content to implement age-verification technology within one year to prevent minors from accessing such material. Covered platforms must use technology to verify users are adults and block minors from accessing pornographic content, though they can choose their own verification method. The FTC will audit compliance and enforce violations as unfair or deceptive practices.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a mandatory age-verification requirement for adult platforms, framed as child protection. The civic tension is not hidden—it is stated plainly—but the bill does not adequately address the privacy and data-security costs of mass age verification, making it a genuine mixed-impact measure rather than a straightforward public-health win.
What the text implies
- Age-verification systems will require platforms to collect, link, and retain personal data (including IP addresses and device identifiers) for all users attempting to access adult content, creating a persistent surveillance infrastructure that extends far beyond the stated child-protection goal.
- Third-party age-verification vendors will become intermediaries holding sensitive user data; the bill does not prohibit data sale, secondary use, or sharing with law enforcement, creating privacy risks independent of platform compliance.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
age-verification technology vendors; identity-verification service providers; data-security and cryptography firms