Congress adds red tape to CFPB consumer rules—small lenders win.
H.R. 1606 — Making the CFPB Accountable to Small Businesses Act of 2025 · Filed by Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 26, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and other federal agencies to conduct more detailed analysis of how their new rules affect small businesses before issuing them. Specifically, it mandates that agencies explain in writing why they chose not to adopt alternatives that would reduce costs for small entities, and must justify any determination that small-business size should not matter to the rule. Small businesses and their advocates benefit by gaining a documented record of agency reasoning; the CFPB faces higher procedural burdens before finalizing rules.
Why we flagged it
The bill does not repeal or defund the CFPB; it adds procedural requirements to its rulemaking process. The operative effect is to impose higher documentation and justification burdens on the agency before it can finalize rules affecting small businesses, which may slow or deter certain consumer-protection rules.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a new litigation vector: small businesses and industry groups can challenge CFPB rules by arguing the agency failed to adequately justify why small-entity alternatives were rejected, potentially invalidating rules even if substantively sound.
- By requiring 'detailed justification' that small-business size 'should have no bearing' on a rule, the bill may implicitly elevate small-business concerns as a policy factor, even when consumer protection or systemic risk argues for uniform rules.
- The procedural requirements apply to all 'covered agencies' under § 609(d)(2), not just the CFPB—this may affect FTC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and other financial regulators, broadening the impact beyond consumer finance.
- Agencies may respond by adopting more small-business carve-outs or exemptions to avoid litigation, potentially fragmenting consumer protections across entity sizes and weakening overall regulatory effectiveness.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Small businesses and their representatives gain procedural transparency and a documented record they can use to challenge rules they view as harmful, which is a genuine democratic accountability benefit. However, the bill may also slow or chill legitimate consumer-protection rulemaking by the CFPB—a cost to consumers if rules protecting them from predatory lending, debt collection abuse, or other harms are delayed or weakened to accommodate small-business concerns. The balance depends on whether
Who stands to gain
- small financial institutions and lenders
- payday lenders and non-bank financial service providers
- debt collection agencies
- consumer finance companies below regulatory thresholds
Named in the bill
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Reserve, small entities (as defined in 5 U.S.C. § 609)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- Feb 26, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 26, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services and House Committee on Small Business · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $7,380,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 51 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Scott Fitzgerald, the sponsor, reported $915,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Bankers Association — $5,210,000 on 2 filings
- Independent Community Bankers of America — $2,170,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,754 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress adds red tape to CFPB consumer rules—small lenders win.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1606 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.