Congress closes transplant loophole: disabled people can no longer be denied life-saving organs
H.R. 1520 — Charlotte Woodward Organ Transplant Discrimination Prevention Act · Filed by Kat Cammack (R-FL) · 28 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 24, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits hospitals, transplant centers, and other health care providers from denying organ transplants or related services to people with disabilities solely because of their disability status. It requires providers to make reasonable accommodations (like communication aids, involving support networks, or supported decision-making) unless doing so would fundamentally alter the service. Providers may still consider a disability medically significant only after individualized physician evaluation, and only if the disability directly affects transplant success or post-transplant compliance.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a civil-rights mandate: it prohibits discrimination in organ transplant access and requires reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. This is a straightforward anti-discrimination statute modeled on the ADA, not a market intervention or appropriation.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'medically significant' disability creates a new evidentiary standard: providers must conduct individualized physician evaluation and document medical nexus, shifting burden of proof away from disabled applicants and toward providers to justify exclusion.
- The 'support network' and 'supported decision-making' provisions may require transplant centers to engage family members, guardians, or advocates in post-transplant care planning, potentially expanding non-medical staff involvement in clinical decision-making.
- Enforcement through HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) creates a parallel administrative remedy to ADA litigation, potentially accelerating complaint resolution but also creating dual-track enforcement that may fragment case law development.
- The bill does not mandate funding for auxiliary aids, support coordination, or home/community-based services needed to enable compliance—providers must offer accommodations but the cost and availability of underlying support services remain a state/payer question.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
People with disabilities gain enforceable rights to equal access to life-saving organ transplants and protection against blanket exclusions based on disability alone. The bill preserves medical judgment (providers can still deny transplants if medically inappropriate) while closing a documented loophole that has historically barred disabled people from transplant consideration.
Named in the bill
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Transplant hospitals, Licensed health care providers, Medicare, Medicaid, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, National Organ Transplant Act, Public Health Service Act
Where it stands
28 cosponsors: 15 Republicans, 13 Democrats.
- Feb 24, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 24, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
- Apr 29, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Apr 29, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 1”
- Jun 23, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2858-2859)”
- Jun 23, 2025 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
7 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $5,963,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 16 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 86% of bills with at least one filing.
Kat Cammack, the sponsor, reported $799,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Medical Association — $5,643,000 on 2 filings
- United Network for Organ Sharing — $110,000 on 2 filings
- National Down Syndrome Society — $100,000 on 2 filings
- Arc of the United States — $80,000 on 2 filings
- Autism Speaks — $30,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,085 characters) on Jun 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress closes transplant loophole: disabled people can no longer be denied life-saving organs” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1520 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.