QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress quietly kills offshore wind tax credits, tilting energy market toward fossil fuels

H.R. 1462 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the production tax credit and investment tax credit for offshore wind facilities placed in service in the inland navigable waters of the United States or the coastal waters of the United States. · Filed by Pat Fallon (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 21, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernFossil Fuel Subsidy via Renewable Energy…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill eliminates three federal tax credits for offshore wind facilities built in U.S. inland navigable waters or coastal waters: the investment tax credit (ITC), the renewable resources production tax credit, and the clean electricity production tax credit. Effective January 1, 2026, wind developers will no longer be able to claim these credits for offshore wind projects in these U.S. waters, making such projects significantly more expensive and less economically viable.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is to strip tax credits from a specific renewable energy source (offshore wind in U.S. waters), not to create new incentives or restrictions on fossil fuels. The net effect is to make renewables uncompetitive and preserve the relative economic advantage of fossil energy—a subsidy by omission rather than direct payment.

What the text implies

  • The bill targets only offshore wind in U.S. waters, leaving onshore wind and other renewables unaffected—suggesting a geographically or politically targeted carve-out rather than a principled energy policy.
  • Removal of these credits does not ban offshore wind; it simply makes projects uneconomical without private capital or state subsidies, potentially shifting development to foreign waters or other nations.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

fossil fuel energy producers (coal, natural gas, oil); traditional utility companies reliant on fossil generation; energy-intensive industries benefiting from lower renewable competition

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record