Congress quietly kills offshore wind tax credits, tilting energy market toward fossil fuels
H.R. 1462 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the production tax credit and investment tax credit for offshore wind facilities placed in service in the inland navigable waters of the United States or the coastal waters of the United States. · Filed by Pat Fallon (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 21, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill eliminates three federal tax credits for offshore wind facilities built in U.S. inland navigable waters or coastal waters: the investment tax credit (ITC), the renewable resources production tax credit, and the clean electricity production tax credit. Effective January 1, 2026, wind developers will no longer be able to claim these credits for offshore wind projects in these U.S. waters, making such projects significantly more expensive and less economically viable.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to strip tax credits from a specific renewable energy source (offshore wind in U.S. waters), not to create new incentives or restrictions on fossil fuels. The net effect is to make renewables uncompetitive and preserve the relative economic advantage of fossil energy—a subsidy by omission rather than direct payment.
What the text implies
- The bill targets only offshore wind in U.S. waters, leaving onshore wind and other renewables unaffected—suggesting a geographically or politically targeted carve-out rather than a principled energy policy.
- Removal of these credits does not ban offshore wind; it simply makes projects uneconomical without private capital or state subsidies, potentially shifting development to foreign waters or other nations.
- The effective date (Jan 1, 2026) allows projects already in development to potentially grandfathered in if placed in service before that date, creating a rush to complete projects and a cliff effect.
- By eliminating credits only for offshore wind, the bill implicitly preserves credits for other renewable sources, raising questions about whether the target is wind technology, offshore development, or a specific geographic region.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose access to cleaner, domestically-produced renewable energy and the associated climate and air-quality benefits. The bill makes offshore wind economically uncompetitive relative to fossil fuels by removing the tax incentives that level the playing field, effectively subsidizing fossil energy by comparison and raising long-term climate and health costs borne by the public.
Who stands to gain
- fossil fuel energy producers (coal, natural gas, oil)
- traditional utility companies reliant on fossil generation
- energy-intensive industries benefiting from lower renewable competition
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code Section 48(a)(5), Internal Revenue Code Section 45(d)(1), Internal Revenue Code Section 45Y(b)(1), U.S. inland navigable waters, U.S. coastal waters, offshore wind industry, renewable energy developers
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- Feb 21, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 21, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 6 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $528,009 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Pat Fallon, the sponsor, reported $359,260 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Milk Producers Federation — $518,009 on 2 filings
- Vineyard Wind 1, LLC — $10,000 on 1 filing
- Vineyard Offshore LLC — $0 on 3 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,231 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress quietly kills offshore wind tax credits, tilting energy market toward fossil fuels” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1462 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.