QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds mental health screening for incarcerated people—with a catch

H.R. 1392 — Improving Mental Healthcare in the Re-Entry System Act of 2025 · Filed by Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ) · Introduced Feb 14, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Criminal Justice Reform / Mental Health…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program requiring states and localities to screen incarcerated people for severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression) at intake and refer them to mental healthcare providers before or after release. The Attorney General establishes an Advisory Board to oversee the program, distribute $100–140 million annually (2026–2030) to prisons and jails, and fund independent research to measure whether the screening reduces recidivism, improves employment, and increases mental healthcare access. The Bureau of Prisons must run a similar program federally.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a public health intervention—screening and referral—embedded in the criminal justice system to improve outcomes for incarcerated people. It is not a punitive measure, nor does it create new criminal liability; it is rehabilitative and evidence-focused.

What the text implies

  • Requires states and localities to hire mental health liaison staff, creating ongoing operational costs beyond the federal grant period; sustainability depends on state/local budget commitment after initial funding.
  • Randomized control trial design means some incarcerated people will be assigned to a control group and NOT receive screening/referral; raises ethical questions about withholding a beneficial intervention for research purposes.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Mental healthcare providers and clinics (increased referrals and patient volume); Independent research organizations (evaluation contracts); State and local corrections agencies (grant funding for staffing and technology)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record