Congress settles century-old tribal water disputes with $1 billion in federal trust funds
H.R. 1322 — Rio San José and Rio Jemez Water Settlements Act of 2025 · Filed by Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill settles long-standing water rights disputes for four New Mexico Pueblos (Acoma, Laguna, Jemez, and Zia) by authorizing federal trust funds totaling approximately $1.05 billion to support water infrastructure, management, and economic development on tribal lands. In exchange, the Pueblos waive most historical water rights claims against the federal government and other parties, while retaining rights to newly acquired water and environmental protections.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to settle tribal water rights claims through federal appropriations and trust fund mechanisms, coupled with waivers of historical litigation. This is a classic Indian water rights settlement statute, not a deregulation, tax measure, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- The bill conditions enforceability on New Mexico enacting state legislation allowing 99-year water leases—a significant state-law change that may affect future water markets and non-tribal water users' ability to lease water long-term.
- Pueblos retain claims for environmental damage (CERCLA, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act) but waive water-rights-specific claims, creating potential for future environmental litigation separate from water allocation disputes.
- The $1.05 billion appropriation is indexed to construction cost inflation from October 2021 onward, meaning actual disbursements could exceed stated amounts if construction costs rise significantly.
- Pueblos gain authority to lease water rights off tribal lands (subject to Secretary approval), potentially enabling water sales to non-tribal entities and creating new revenue streams not explicitly constrained by the bill.
- The bill expires if the Secretary fails to publish enforceability findings by July 1, 2030, creating a hard deadline that could collapse the entire settlement if administrative delays occur.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens in New Mexico benefit from resolution of a decades-long litigation that has blocked water development and created legal uncertainty. The settlement provides Pueblos with resources for domestic water security, agricultural support, and infrastructure—addressing real public health and economic needs. Non-Pueblo water users (farmers, municipalities) gain certainty and finality in water allocation. The waiver of historical claims, while significant, is the price of settlement and a
Who stands to gain
- Pueblo of Acoma
- Pueblo of Laguna
- Pueblo of Jemez
- Pueblo of Zia
- water infrastructure contractors
- engineering and construction firms
- acequia associations (community irrigation ditches)
Named in the bill
Pueblo of Acoma, Pueblo of Laguna, Pueblo of Jemez, Pueblo of Zia, U.S. Department of Interior, State of New Mexico, Rio San José Stream System, Jemez River Stream System, U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, Bureau of Reclamation, Acomita Reservoir, Signatory Acequias — and 1 more
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Feb 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 13, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $20,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 2 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Teresa Leger Fernandez, the sponsor, reported $239,350 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Pueblo of Laguna — $20,000 on 1 filing
- Pueblo of Laguna — $0 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress settles century-old tribal water disputes with $1 billion in federal trust funds” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1322 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.