Bill lets companies strip worker protections by offering benefits
H.R. 1320 — Modern Worker Security Act · Filed by Kevin Kiley (I-CA) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits federal law from considering whether a company provides benefits—such as health insurance, retirement savings, paid leave, or training—when determining if someone is an employee or an independent contractor. By removing benefits from the employment-status calculus, the bill makes it easier for companies to classify workers as contractors rather than employees, even when those workers receive substantial employer-provided benefits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to remove a key legal test (benefit provision) that courts and agencies use to determine whether someone qualifies as an employee. This directly facilitates reclassification of employees as contractors, reducing employer obligations and worker protections.
What the text implies
- Workers receiving portable benefits (health insurance, retirement, training) funded by employers can be reclassified as contractors, losing FLSA minimum-wage and overtime protections, FMLA leave rights, unemployment insurance eligibility, and Title VII anti-discrimination coverage.
- The bill may interact with state employment laws and common-law tests (control, integration, economic dependence) in unpredictable ways; federal prohibition does not override state law, creating a patchwork where federal contractors face different rules than state-regulated workers.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
gig-economy platforms (Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, etc.); staffing and temp agencies; companies using contractor workforces