Congress demands annual export-control reports—but keeps them secret from the public
H.R. 1316 — Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act · Filed by Ronny Jackson (R-TX) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Signed
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Commerce Department to submit annual reports to Congress detailing export license applications and end-use checks for controlled items shipped to entities in sanctioned countries (primarily China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Syria). The reports must include applicant names, item descriptions, end-user locations, approval decisions, and compliance-check results—though sensitive enforcement information and most details remain confidential to Congress only, not the public.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate congressional reporting on export licenses to sanctioned entities, strengthening legislative oversight of executive branch export-control decisions. It is a transparency and accountability mechanism, not a deregulation or industry carve-out.
What the text implies
- Reports are confidential to Congress only—the public and affected exporters receive no transparency, limiting broader democratic accountability and industry ability to understand policy direction.
- The bill does not mandate public disclosure of approval/denial rates or patterns, so Congress may gain insight while the public remains in the dark about export-control enforcement trends.
- Reporting burden falls on Commerce Department; no appropriations are guaranteed ('subject to availability of appropriations'), meaning reports may be delayed or incomplete if funding lapses.
- The bill covers only 'covered entities' in sanctioned countries groups—legitimate exporters to non-sanctioned nations receive no new transparency requirement, creating an asymmetric reporting regime.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill increases congressional oversight of export controls affecting national security by requiring detailed, regular reporting on transactions to adversarial nations. Citizens benefit from stronger democratic accountability over a critical national-security function, though the benefit is indirect (improved legislative scrutiny rather than direct consumer protection).
Named in the bill
Commerce Department, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Country Group D:5 (sanctioned nations), Export Administration Regulations
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Feb 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 13, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”
- May 5, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1834-1835)”
- May 5, 2025 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Mast moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Passed both chambers · Congress.gov: “Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4573)”
- Aug 15, 2025 — Sent to president · Congress.gov: “Presented to President”
- Aug 19, 2025 — Signed into law · Congress.gov: “Became Public Law No: 119-34”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $196,980 in lobbying spend. A filing names 14 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Ronny Jackson, the sponsor, reported $482,600 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Mediatek USA Inc. — $136,980 on 1 filing
- American Nephrology Nurses Association — $60,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 13, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,718 characters) on Jun 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 13, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands annual export-control reports—but keeps them secret from the public” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1316 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.