QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Colorado water project gets federal interest-rate cut, 75-year repayment deal

H.R. 131 — Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act · Filed by Lauren Boebert (R-CO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Vetoed

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Water Infrastructure Subsidy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill modifies the repayment terms for the Arkansas Valley Conduit, a water infrastructure project in Colorado. It reduces the federal government's share of repayment obligations from a complex formula (35% plus revenue from excess capacity contracts) to a fixed 35% payment, and allows the remaining balance to be repaid over up to 75 years at a reduced interest rate (50% of the Treasury rate) if the contracting parties demonstrate financial hardship. Local water districts assume full responsibility for operations, maintenance, and replacement.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a reduction in federal interest rates and extension of repayment terms for a regional water project, funded by federal taxpayers. While framed as enabling rural water access, the core function is a financial subsidy to local water districts.

What the text implies

  • The 'financial hardship' standard in subsection (d)(1)(B) is undefined and delegated entirely to the Secretary of the Interior, creating discretionary authority to grant interest-rate subsidies without statutory criteria or public notice.
  • Shifting from a revenue-sharing formula (35% + excess capacity revenue) to a fixed 35% payment may reduce federal cost recovery if excess capacity contracts generate significant revenue, effectively subsidizing the project.
  • The 75-year repayment period with simple interest at 50% of Treasury rates represents a substantial below-market financing arrangement; the federal government bears the opportunity cost of foregone market-rate returns.
  • Local water districts assume all O&M and replacement costs, but the bill does not specify how cost overruns or infrastructure failures are allocated, potentially creating unfunded federal liability.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Rural Colorado households gain access to reliable domestic water supplies at lower cost through reduced interest rates and extended repayment periods, a genuine public benefit. However, the bill shifts repayment risk and interest-rate subsidy to federal taxpayers, and the 'financial hardship' standard is undefined, creating potential for discretionary subsidy without clear public-interest guardrails.

Who stands to gain

  • Colorado water districts and municipalities served by the Arkansas Valley Conduit
  • Rural households in the project service area (indirect beneficiaries via lower water costs)

Named in the bill

Arkansas Valley Conduit, Fryingpan-Arkansas project, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of the Treasury, Colorado water districts, Public Law 87-590

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.

  • Jan 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jan 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
  • Jun 25, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
  • Jun 25, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent”
  • Jul 21, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3497-3498)”
  • Jul 21, 2025 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Gosar moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
  • Dec 16, 2025 — Passed both chambers · Congress.gov: “Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S8766-8768)”
  • Dec 18, 2025 — Sent to president · Congress.gov: “Presented to President”
  • Dec 29, 2025 — Vetoed · Congress.gov: “Vetoed by President”
  • Jan 8, 2026 — Failed · Congress.gov: “Failed of passage in House over veto On passage, the objections of the President to the contrary…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,048 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Colorado water project gets federal interest-rate cut, 75-year repayment deal” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr131 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.