QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates free prostate cancer screening for high-risk men

H.R. 1300 — PSA Screening for HIM Act · Filed by Neal Dunn (R-FL) · 36 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Equity Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires health insurance plans to cover prostate cancer screening without cost-sharing (copays, deductibles) for men age 40+ who are at high risk—specifically African-American men and men with a family history of prostate cancer. The bill cites data showing African-American men have significantly higher prostate cancer rates and mortality, and that early detection dramatically improves survival. Coverage takes effect January 1, 2026.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward insurance coverage mandate targeting a documented health disparity. It amends the Public Health Service Act to add prostate cancer screening to preventive services that must be covered without cost-sharing for high-risk men.

What the text implies

  • The bill defines 'high-risk' narrowly (African-American men and those with family history), which may exclude other high-risk populations (e.g., men with certain genetic markers not yet widely screened) and could create a precedent for race-based or ancestry-based insurance coverage categories.
  • Removal of cost-sharing may increase screening volume, which could lead to higher rates of PSA-positive results and downstream biopsies—some of which detect clinically insignificant cancers, potentially increasing overtreatment and associated harms.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

health insurance issuers (reduced downstream metastatic cancer treatment costs); urological practices and diagnostic imaging centers (increased screening volume); PSA test manufacturers and laboratory service providers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record