QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

President gets sweeping power to gut federal agencies without Congress

H.R. 1295 — Reorganizing Government Act of 2025 · Filed by James Comer (R-KY) · 19 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 13, 2025 · Reported out

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
68/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Critical concernExecutive Power Expansion / Deregulation…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands the President's power to reorganize federal agencies and operations without requiring congressional approval. It adds new grounds for reorganization—including eliminating operations deemed unnecessary, reducing federal employees, amending regulations to lower compliance costs, and eliminating operations deemed not to serve the public interest—and extends the President's reorganization authority through December 31, 2026. The bill does not require Congress to vote on or approve any specific reorganization the President proposes.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to grant the President broad, largely unchecked authority to reorganize, downsize, and deregulate federal agencies. While framed as 'efficient reorganization,' the operative language ('unnecessary,' 'do not serve the public interest,' 'burdensome rules') is deliberately vague and grants sweeping discretion without requiring congressional approval or public justification.

What the text implies

  • The phrase 'operations determined to be unnecessary for the execution of constitutional duties' is undefined and could be used to eliminate entire agencies (EPA, OSHA, SEC, etc.) on the theory that they exceed constitutional scope—a radical reinterpretation of executive power that bypasses Congress.
  • The 'reduce the number of Federal employees' provision, combined with 'eliminate unnecessary and burdensome rules,' creates a two-pronged attack on regulatory enforcement: fewer staff + fewer rules = dramatically weakened agency capacity to enforce environmental, labor, financial, and consumer protections.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

industries subject to federal regulation (energy, finance, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, telecommuni; large corporations seeking reduced compliance costs and regulatory oversight; private contractors potentially hired to replace federal functions

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record