Congress mandates nationwide police deadly force data—finally
H.R. 1240 — National Statistics on Deadly Force Transparency Act of 2025 · Filed by Steve Cohen (D-TN) · Introduced Feb 12, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Attorney General to establish federal regulations mandating that all law enforcement agencies—federal, state, and local—collect and report standardized data on every instance of deadly force used by officers. The data must include details about the person killed (race, gender, age, religion), the officer involved, circumstances, and whether non-lethal alternatives were attempted. The Department of Justice will compile and publish this data publicly (with individual names redacted), and states/localities that fail to report face a 10% cut in federal law enforcement grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate systematic federal data collection on police use of deadly force and public reporting—a transparency and accountability mechanism, not a regulatory restriction on police conduct itself. It creates visibility into patterns that inform policy and public debate.
What the text implies
- Standardized national data on deadly force may reveal disparities in police use by race/ethnicity, potentially triggering political pressure for local policy changes or federal intervention.
- The 10% Byrne JAG grant penalty creates financial leverage over state/local law enforcement, making federal data compliance a condition of federal funding—a form of conditional federalism that could shift power toward DOJ oversight.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain transparency into police use of deadly force—a critical public accountability mechanism—and can now access aggregated national data to understand patterns of force by race, location, and circumstance. The redaction of individual names protects privacy while enabling public scrutiny.