QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to restore Confederate general's name to Army base

H.R. 1214 — To require the name of military installation under jurisdiction of Secretary of the Army located in Fayetteville, North Carolina, to be known and designated as Fort Bragg, and for other purposes. · Filed by Keith Self (R-TX) · Introduced Feb 11, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Military Installation Renaming

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Army installation in Fayetteville, North Carolina, to be officially renamed 'Fort Bragg.' The installation is currently known by a different name (likely Fort Liberty, renamed in 2023). The bill mandates that all federal references—in laws, regulations, maps, documents, and records—treat the new name as the official designation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative function is to mandate a specific name for a federal military facility. It is a straightforward renaming statute with no regulatory, appropriations, or policy mechanism beyond the designation itself.

What the text implies

  • Reverses the 2023 renaming of Fort Liberty back to Fort Bragg, signaling Congressional willingness to override military administrative naming decisions through legislation rather than deference to executive branch authority.
  • Sets precedent that military installation names are subject to legislative override, potentially inviting future Congressional renaming efforts on other bases.
  • The phrase 'and for other purposes' in the title is boilerplate and does not indicate hidden provisions; the bill text contains only the renaming mandate.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill has no direct material effect on ordinary citizens' rights, costs, or protections. However, it represents a reversal of a prior naming decision made through military administrative process, raising questions about the stability of federal naming policy and whether Congress should override executive branch naming authority on military installations.

Named in the bill

Secretary of the Army, Fayetteville, North Carolina, Fort Bragg, Fort Liberty, House Committee on Armed Services, Rep. Self (sponsor)

Where it stands

  • Feb 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Feb 11, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $10,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.

Keith Self, the sponsor, reported $185,131 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Lehigh University — $10,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 14, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,473 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jan 14, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress moves to restore Confederate general's name to Army base” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1214 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.