QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates cash acceptance, protecting unbanked shoppers from digital-only retail

H.R. 1138 — Payment Choice Act of 2025 · Filed by John Rose (R-TN) · 25 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 7, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Payment Rights Protection

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires retail businesses that accept in-person payments to accept cash for transactions up to $500 and prohibits charging cash customers higher prices than card-paying customers. It includes narrow exceptions for system failures or insufficient change, and allows retailers to offer fee-free cash-to-prepaid-card conversion devices. For five years, retailers can refuse large bills ($50+), after which the Treasury must issue rules requiring acceptance of $1–$20 denominations. Customers can sue for violations, with damages starting at $250 and civil penalties up to $1,500.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to protect consumer choice and access by mandating cash acceptance at retail. It is not primarily a financial-sector regulation or deregulation, but rather a consumer protection measure that constrains retailer behavior in favor of payment method neutrality.

What the text implies

  • May accelerate adoption of cash-to-prepaid-card conversion devices as a workaround, potentially creating new fee structures downstream (inactivity fees on prepaid cards) that could disproportionately affect low-income cash users.
  • The 5-year exemption for large bills ($50+) creates a temporary two-tier system; Treasury rulemaking in year 5 could become a flashpoint if industry lobbies for continued exemptions.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Unbanked and underbanked consumers (financial inclusion benefit, not a sector); Prepaid card issuers (if retailers adopt conversion devices); Civil litigation bar (private right of action creates attorney fee opportunities)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record