Federal procurement shifts from lowest cost to agency discretion—favoring established vendors.
H.R. 1118 — Value Over Cost Act of 2026 · Filed by Byron Donalds (R-FL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 7, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal procurement law to change how the government evaluates bids under the multiple award schedule program—a system used to buy goods and services from pre-approved vendors. Instead of automatically choosing the lowest-cost option, agencies may now select the bid offering the best overall value, which can include factors like quality, delivery speed, and vendor reliability alongside price. This gives federal buyers more flexibility to balance cost savings with performance.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a single statutory amendment that shifts federal procurement evaluation from a bright-line lowest-cost rule to a discretionary best-value standard. This is a procedural/structural change to how government buys goods, not a substantive policy or appropriation.
What the text implies
- Removes the lowest-cost 'safe harbor' that protected agencies from bid protests—best-value decisions are more vulnerable to legal challenge and may increase litigation costs.
- Shifts bargaining power toward vendors with established relationships and reputations; smaller or newer suppliers may face disadvantage if 'best value' criteria favor incumbents.
- Creates discretion that may be exercised inconsistently across agencies, leading to unpredictable procurement outcomes and potential for favoritism or regional bias.
- May increase total procurement costs if agencies weight non-price factors heavily; no requirement to justify cost premiums or demonstrate ROI on quality/performance upgrades.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens may benefit from higher-quality goods and services if agencies use best-value discretion wisely, but the shift from a transparent, rule-bound lowest-cost standard to a subjective best-value standard creates risk of favoritism, reduced competition, and higher taxpayer costs if agencies do not apply rigorous evaluation criteria. The outcome depends entirely on implementation.
Who stands to gain
- established defense contractors and GSA schedule vendors with strong reputations
- vendors offering premium or differentiated products (higher margins than commodity suppliers)
Named in the bill
General Services Administration (GSA), Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program, 41 U.S.C. § 152(3)(B), federal procurement agencies
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Feb 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 7, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Armed Services and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed…”
- Feb 4, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Feb 5, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0”
- Jul 20, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Burlison moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required)…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $4,320,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Byron Donalds, the sponsor, reported $66,946 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company & Affiliates — $2,340,000 on 3 filings
- HP Inc — $1,980,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (348 characters) on Jun 11, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal procurement shifts from lowest cost to agency discretion—favoring established vendors.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1118 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.